Read summary
Single cell sample summary
This table summarises the number of input reads, and the number of cells, genes and transcripts identified within each sample.
sample ID | reads | cells | genes | transcripts |
---|---|---|---|---|
3prime_v4 | 16309 | 1962 | 220 | 201 |
test_3prime_5k | 4944 | 1263 | 69 | 60 |
test_5prime_5k | 4878 | 690 | 57 | 46 |
test_multiome_5k | 4999 | 1112 | 24 | 19 |
Alignment summary
Summaries of genome read alignment per sample.
Note that reads aligned may be less than the total number of input reads if non-full-length reads were filtered. see option: full_length_only.sample | reads_aligned | primary | secondary | supplementary | unmapped |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
test_3prime_5k | 4520 | 1314 | 833 | 28 | 3206 |
test_multiome_5k | 4329 | 1048 | 1701 | 80 | 3281 |
test_5prime_5k | 3457 | 927 | 242 | 13 | 2530 |
3prime_v4 | 15397 | 15037 | 6628 | 290 | 360 |
Read survival by stage
These plots detail the number of remaining reads at different stages of the workflow.
- full length: Proportion of reads containing adapters in expected configurations.
- total tagged: Proportion of reads that have been assigned corrected UMIs and barcodes.
- gene tagged: Proportion of reads assigned to a gene.
- transcripts tagged: Proportion of reads assigned a transcript.
Primer configuration
Full length reads are identified by locating read segments flanked by known primers in expected orientations: adapter1---full_length_read---adapter2.
These full length reads can then be oriented in the same way and are used in the next stages of the workflow.
Every library prep will contain some level of artifact reads including mis-primed reads and those without adapters. These are identified by non-standard primer configurations, and are not used for subsequent stages of the workflow. The plots here show the proportions of different primer configurations within each sample, which can help diagnosing library preparation issues. The majority of reads should be full_length.
The primers used to identify read segments vary slightly between the supported kits. They are:
3prime, multiome and visium kits:
- Adapter1: Read1
- Adapter2: TSO
5prime kit:
- Adapter1: Read1
- Adapter2: Non-Poly(dT) RT primer
Diagnostic plots
Knee plotThe knee plot is a quality control for RNA-seq data and illustrates the procedure used to filter invalid cells. The X-axis represents cells ranked by number of reads and the Y-axis reads per barcode. The vertical dashed line shows the cutoff. Cells to the right of this are assumed to be invalid cells, including dead cells and background from empty droplets.
Saturation plotsSequencing saturation provides a view of the amount of library complexity that has been captured in the experiment. As read depth increases, the number of genes and distinct UMIs identified will increase at a rate that is dependent on the complexity of the input library. A steep slope indicates that new genes or UMIs could still be identified by increasing the read coverage. A slope which flattens towards higher read coverage indicates that the full library complexity is being well captured.
- Gene saturation: Genes per cell as a function of depth.
- UMI saturation: UMIs per cell as a function of read depth.
- Sequencing saturation: This metric is a measure of the proportion of reads that come from a previously observed UMI, and is calculated with the following formula: 1 - (number of unique UMIs / number of reads).
UMAP projections
This section presents various UMAP projections of the data. UMAP is an unsupervised algorithm that projects the multidimensional single cell expression data into 2 dimensions. This could reveal structure in the data representing different cell types or cells that share common regulatory pathways, for example. The UMAP algorithm is stochastic; analysing the same data multiple times with UMAP, using identical parameters, can lead to visually different projections. In order to have some confidence in the observed results, it can be useful to run the projection multiple times and so a series of UMAP projections can be viewed below.
The following genes were not in the dataset / so have been filtered out: Fth1, Cox8a, mt-Co1, Gnaq, FTL, JSRP1, Armh3
The following genes were not in the dataset / so have been filtered out: Fth1, Cox8a, mt-Co1, Gnaq, FTL, JSRP1, Armh3
The following genes were not in the dataset / so have been filtered out: Fth1, Cox8a, mt-Co1, Gnaq, FTL, JSRP1, Armh3
The following genes were not in the dataset / so have been filtered out: Fth1, Cox8a, mt-Co1, Gnaq, FTL, JSRP1, Armh3
The following genes were not in the dataset / so have been filtered out: Fth1, Cox8a, mt-Co1, Gnaq, FTL, JSRP1, Armh3
The following genes were not in the dataset / so have been filtered out: Fth1, Cox8a, mt-Co1, Gnaq, FTL, JSRP1, Armh3
The following genes were not in the dataset / so have been filtered out: Fth1, Cox8a, mt-Co1, Gnaq, FTL, JSRP1, Armh3
The following genes were not in the dataset / so have been filtered out: Fth1, Cox8a, mt-Co1, Gnaq, FTL, JSRP1, Armh3
The following genes were not in the dataset / so have been filtered out: Fth1, Cox8a, mt-Co1, Gnaq, FTL, JSRP1, Armh3
The following genes were not in the dataset / so have been filtered out: Fth1, Cox8a, mt-Co1, Gnaq, FTL, JSRP1, Armh3
The following genes were not in the dataset / so have been filtered out: Fth1, Cox8a, mt-Co1, Gnaq, FTL, JSRP1, Armh3
The following genes were not in the dataset / so have been filtered out: Fth1, Cox8a, mt-Co1, Gnaq, FTL, JSRP1, Armh3